BERT

🔍

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. My question: Yes / no, is the following a verifiable fact? "Who Framed Roger Rabbit contained an all live action cast." Please think gradually:

answer:To answer the question, let's break it down step-by-step: Step 1: Understand the claim The claim is that "Who Framed Roger Rabbit contained an all live action cast." Step 2: Analyze the claim "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" is a 1988 film directed by Robert Zemeckis. The movie is known for its combination of live-action and animated characters. The claim suggests that the film only had live-action actors in its cast. Step 3: Verify the information To verify the claim, we need to check if "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" had only live-action actors in its cast or if it also included animated characters. Step 4: Gather evidence Upon researching the movie, it is evident that "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" is famous for its groundbreaking combination of live-action and animated characters. The film features live-action actors like Bob Hoskins, Christopher Lloyd, and Joanna Cassidy, but it also includes numerous animated characters, such as Roger Rabbit, Jessica Rabbit, and various other "Toon" characters. Conclusion: Based on the evidence, the claim that "Who Framed Roger Rabbit contained an all live action cast" is not a verifiable fact. The movie features both live-action actors and animated characters. Therefore, the answer is no.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. For every bike Henry sells, he is paid 8 more than he is paid to paint the bike. If Henry gets 5 to paint the bike, how much does he get paid to sell and paint 8 bikes? Let's think: Henry gets paid 5 + 13 = 18 for each bike painted and sold. In total, Henry will be paid 8 * 18 = 144 for painting and selling 8 bikes.. The answer is: 144. From Sunday to Thursday, Prudence sleeps 6 hours a night. Friday and Saturday she sleeps for 9 hours a night. She also takes a 1-hour nap on Saturday and Sunday. How much sleep does she get in 4 weeks? Let's think: 5 nights a week she sleeps for 6 hours so she sleeps 5 * 6 = 30 hours. 2 nights a week she sleeps for 9 hours so she sleeps 2 * 9 = 18 hours. 2 days a week she naps for 1 hour so she sleeps 2 * 1 = 2 hours. Over 1 week she sleeps 30 + 18 + 2 = 50 hours. Over 4 weeks she sleeps 4 * 50 = 200 hours.. The answer is: 200. Annie went to a liquidation sale and bought 5 televisions that each cost 50. She also purchased 10 figurines. If Annie spent 260 in total, how much did a single figurine cost in dollars? Let's think: Annie spent 5 * 50 = 250 on televisions. She has 260 - 250 = 10 left for the 10 figurines. A single figurine costs 10 / 10 = 1.. The answer is: 1. A hot dog stand sells 10 hot dogs every hour, each one selling for 2. How many hours does the stand need to run to make 200 in sales? Let's think:

answer:The stand makes 10 hot dogs * 2 = 20 per hour. To make 200 in sales, the stand needs to run for 200 / 20 = 10 hours. The answer is: 10.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Question. Given the sentence "A young woman in a black sweatshirt is sitting on a concrete staircase." is it true that "Smoking a cigarette while working on her laptop."? Answer. it is not possible to tell What step-by-step reasoning justifies that answer?

answer:Step 1: Identify the information provided in the given sentence. The given sentence states, "A young woman in a black sweatshirt is sitting on a concrete staircase." Step 2: Break down the components of the sentence. - Subject: A young woman - Clothing: Black sweatshirt - Action: Sitting - Location: Concrete staircase Step 3: Identify the information in the questioned statement. The questioned statement is, "Smoking a cigarette while working on her laptop." Step 4: Break down the components of the questioned statement. - Action 1: Smoking a cigarette - Action 2: Working on her laptop Step 5: Compare the components of the given sentence with the questioned statement. The given sentence provides information about the subject, clothing, action, and location. However, it does not mention anything about the young woman smoking a cigarette or working on her laptop. Step 6: Evaluate the possibility of the questioned statement being true based on the given information. Since the given sentence does not provide any information about the young woman smoking a cigarette or working on her laptop, it is not possible to tell if the questioned statement is true. Conclusion: Based on the step-by-step reasoning, it is not possible to tell if the statement "Smoking a cigarette while working on her laptop" is true, as the given sentence does not provide enough information to confirm or deny this statement.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Premise: "Two women are standing around a red chair in the center of a room while other women sit around the edges of the room." Hypothesis: "Two women are joyously standing around a red chair." Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

answer:To determine if the hypothesis is entailed by the premise, we need to compare the information given in the premise with the information in the hypothesis. Premise: "Two women are standing around a red chair in the center of a room while other women sit around the edges of the room." Hypothesis: "Two women are joyously standing around a red chair." The premise tells us that there are two women standing around a red chair, which is consistent with the hypothesis. However, the premise does not provide any information about the emotional state or demeanor of the women, such as whether they are "joyously" standing around the chair. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the hypothesis is entailed by the premise, as it introduces new information (the women being joyous) that is not present or inferred from the premise.