question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. [QUESTION] Premise: "A man in a blue jumpsuit and red helmet is climbing up a ladder and another man is watching him." Hypothesis: "A man and an onlooker get ready to take a nap." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no To get ready to take a nap does not include climbing a ladder. The answer is no. Q: If "Young men watching sesame street." does that mean that "The men are reading books."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no A: They can't be watching something and reading something at the same time. The answer is no. QUESTION: Premise: "An adult helps a young child fix her goggles." Hypothesis: "An adult helps a child wear goggles." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Let's solve it slowly: Goggles may need to be fix before they can be worn. The answer is yes. [QUESTION] Given the sentence "A woman is riding a palomino horse." is it true that "A woman is performing for a audience."? Riding a palomino horse does not imply performing in front of an audience. The answer is it is not possible to tell. Q: Premise: "Two men wearing santa claus costumes are dancing while people watch." Hypothesis: "Two old men wearing santa claus costumes are tango dancing while people watch." Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A: The men might not be old and they might not be tango dancing. The answer is it is not possible to tell. [QUESTION] Premise: "A man in a red hat is holding a bag that has a can in it." Hypothesis: "A man is holding books." Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Lizzy: The average of marks scored in four tests by Jake was 75. If jake scored 80 marks in the first test and 10 more in the second test, and an equal number of marks in the third and fourth test, calculate the marks he scored in the third test.. Me: Hmmm, let me think. I think this is the detailed solution:

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Premise: "A couple goes around the beach picking up garbage." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A couple goes around the beach throwing trash away." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Chain-of-thought: We live in a society of gender equality, so girls also have the rights to receive education. -- Question: One of the following sentences is nonsensical. Which one is it? Options: - Sentence A: "Both genders of students can have equal chances to receive education." - Sentence B: "Boys should have priority to receive education." Answer: Sentence B Chain-of-thought: A baseball game must consist of more than one team to compete against one another. Question: Of the below sentences, which one does *not* make sense? Options: - Sentence A: "Baseball is a sport involving two teams of players" - Sentence B: "Baseball is a sport involving one teams of players" Answer: Sentence B Explanation for the following question's answer: An actor is not allowed to play games in a serious play. Question: Choose the sentence that goes against common sense. Options: - Sentence A: "An actor plays a character in a play." - Sentence B: "An actor plays games in a play." Answer: Sentence B Chain-of-thought: A car is too big to eat and it is not food. -- Question: Which of these sentences doesn't make sense? Options: - Sentence A: "He ate a car." - Sentence B: "He ate a cucumber." Answer: Sentence A Chain-of-thought: Tigers are carnivores not herbivores, therefore would not eat carrots. Question: Of the following two sentences, which one is against common sense? Options: - Sentence A: "Rabbits love to eat carrots." - Sentence B: "Tigers love to eat carrots." Answer: Sentence B Chain-of-thought: A sport team that is composed of five players would be a basketball team. --