BERT

🔍

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. QUESTION: Premise: "A man in a black suit." Hypothesis: "Is standing in front of a group of people in white suits and black dresses." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Let's solve it slowly: A man in a suit stands in front of a well dressed party. The answer is yes. [QUESTION] If "Someone is at the water's edge with two dogs." does that mean that "A woman is going to go for a swim with her two dogs."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Someone could be a man or a woman. She could be standing at the water's edge with no thought of going to go for a swim with her dogs. The answer is it is not possible to tell. Q: Given the sentence "The ball carrier is being tackled by a group of opposing players." is it true that "The guy who had the ball was tackled by the other team."? A: The guy who had the ball was tackled by the other team implies the ball carrier and a group of opposing players. The answer is yes. QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A baby holding glasses looks at the camera while a man hugs him." that "The baby is fast asleep in its crib."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Let's solve it slowly: If the baby is asleep it would not be able to hold the glasses because it would not be awake. The answer is no. [QUESTION] Premise: "A homeless man with puke on his sleeve lies on the floor as a man in a beige leisure suit uses the telephone." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The men are best friends trying to settle a bet of who is better at wrestling." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no They could not settle a bet if one of them is using a telephone. The answer is no. Q: If "A man is jumping in water in a plaid shirt." does that mean that "The man jumps in the lake to save an animal."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no A:

answer:The man jumping in water in a plaid shirt does not provide any information about the reason for his jump, such as saving an animal. The answer is it is not possible to tell.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Can we conclude from "Three children and an adult view an electronic device that the adult is holding." that "The three children are running away from the adult with a non electronic device."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

answer:No, we cannot conclude that "The three children are running away from the adult with a non-electronic device" from the given statement "Three children and an adult view an electronic device that the adult is holding." Here's the step-by-step justification: 1. The original statement describes a situation where three children and an adult are together, viewing an electronic device held by the adult. 2. There is no mention of the children running away or the adult holding a non-electronic device in the original statement. 3. Without any additional information or context, we cannot infer that the children are running away or that the adult is holding a non-electronic device. Therefore, the answer is no.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Given the sentence "An excited boy in striped sweater seated doing an artwork on a wooden table with his tongue out." is it true that "A boy in a striped sweater sits and does artwork."? Step by step answer:

answer:Step 1: Identify the main subject and action in the sentence. The main subject in the sentence is "An excited boy in striped sweater," and the main action is "seated doing an artwork." Step 2: Compare the main subject and action in the original sentence with the statement. The statement says, "A boy in a striped sweater sits and does artwork." Here, the main subject is "A boy in a striped sweater," and the main action is "sits and does artwork." Step 3: Determine if the subject and action in the statement match the original sentence. The subject in the statement matches the original sentence, as both describe a boy in a striped sweater. The action in the statement is also similar to the original sentence, as both describe the boy sitting and doing artwork. Step 4: Check for additional relevant information in the original sentence. The original sentence also mentions that the boy is excited, seated at a wooden table, and has his tongue out. However, this information is not included in the statement. Step 5: Evaluate if the statement is true based on the matching subject and action. Despite the missing details, the statement "A boy in a striped sweater sits and does artwork" captures the main subject and action of the original sentence. Therefore, it is true that "A boy in a striped sweater sits and does artwork."

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Premise: "A man in a pink." Hypothesis: "Green and yellow hat lined with fur closes his eyes on a subway." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

answer:To determine if the hypothesis is entailed by the premise, we need to examine the relationship between the information provided in the premise and the hypothesis. Premise: "A man in a pink." Hypothesis: "Green and yellow hat lined with fur closes his eyes on a subway." The premise provides information about a man wearing something pink, but it does not specify what the pink item is. The hypothesis, on the other hand, describes a man wearing a green and yellow hat lined with fur, closing his eyes on a subway. Given the available information, there is no clear connection between the premise and the hypothesis. The premise does not provide any information about the man's hat or his actions on the subway. Therefore, we cannot determine if the hypothesis is entailed by the premise. The correct answer is: it is not possible to tell.