BERT

🔍

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Can we conclude from "A boy has blown four bubbles on the lawn." that "The boy is outdoors."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell yes Explanation: In order for a boy to blow bubbles on the lawn he has to be outdoors.. Premise: "Two people canoe down a river at the time of a beautiful sunset." Hypothesis: "Two people watch professional wrestling." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no no Explanation: People who are canoe down the river can not be at a wrestling show at the same time.. Premise: "Three people work to move a heavy cylindrical object with pulleys." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "People are using a pulley to move a heavy object." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no yes Explanation: Three people are using a pulley to move a heavy cylindrical object.. Given the sentence "A line is beginning to form at the cheap tab shop." is it true that "The store is abandoned."?

answer:no Explanation: A line beginning to form at the shop indicates that people are present and interested in the shop's offerings, which contradicts the idea of the store being abandoned.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Given the sentence "A woman standing in front of a couple of vending machines." can we conclude that "A woman is standing in front of a couple of vending machines."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

answer:To determine if we can conclude that "A woman is standing in front of a couple of vending machines" based on the given sentence, let's break down the information provided: 1. We have a subject: "A woman." 2. We have an action: "standing." 3. We have a location: "in front of a couple of vending machines." Now, let's analyze the given sentence: "A woman standing in front of a couple of vending machines." It appears that the sentence is describing a scene or an image. The sentence provides information about a woman and her position relative to the vending machines. Based on this analysis, it seems reasonable to conclude that: - Yes, "A woman is standing in front of a couple of vending machines."

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. **Q** Claim: "Jeremy Irons acted in Shakespearean works." Is the claim above correct, and can it be verified by human common sense and without a web search? Options: - yes - no **A** yes Jeremy Irons has acted in numerous roles including Shakespeare. Does the following sentence make sense? "I became a Millionaire quickly from working as a cashier." Options: - yes - no no You are not paid that much money working as a cashier. **Q** "Slavs have lived in Eastern Europe for centuries." Is the above claim true? Options: - yes - no **A** yes Many Eastern European countries are Slavic countries where the majority of the population are Slavs, and some of these countries like Russia have existed for centuries. Yes / no, is the following a verifiable fact? "While there may be overlap between the two genres, sci-fi and Fantasy are considered distinctive types of fiction." yes Because science fiction tends to be more grounded, and tries to build worlds based around reality; fantasy is more imaginative, and doesn't limit itself to whether something is plausible or not, which is an example of why the two genres are considered different. **Q** Is the following statement true? "Winifred Hart is contesting for a seat in the Member of the European Parliament." **A** no The statement is totally false as no Winifred Hart is contesting for any seat in the Member of the European Parliament. **Q** Does the following sentence make sense? "The Exclamation mark can emphasize a feeling of surprise in a sentence." Options: - yes - no **A**

answer:yes The exclamation mark is used to indicate strong feelings or high volume, and it can be used to emphasize surprise in a sentence.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. A man rows his boat 85 km downstream and 45 km upstream, taking 2 1/2 hours each time. Find the speed of the stream? Options: (A) 5 kmph (B) 6 kmph (C) 7 kmph (D) 8 kmph (E) 9 kmph Stream of consciousness first, then make a decision:

answer:Let's denote the speed of the man in still water as 'x' kmph and the speed of the stream as 'y' kmph. When the man rows downstream, the effective speed is the sum of the man's speed and the speed of the stream (x + y) kmph. Since he covers 85 km in 2.5 hours, we can write the equation: 85 = (x + y) * 2.5 When the man rows upstream, the effective speed is the difference between the man's speed and the speed of the stream (x - y) kmph. Since he covers 45 km in 2.5 hours, we can write another equation: 45 = (x - y) * 2.5 Now, we have two equations with two variables (x and y): 1) 85 = (x + y) * 2.5 2) 45 = (x - y) * 2.5 Let's solve the system of equations: Step 1: Divide both equations by 2.5 to simplify: 1) 34 = x + y 2) 18 = x - y Step 2: Add the two equations together to eliminate the 'y' variable: (34 + 18) = (x + y) + (x - y) 52 = 2x Step 3: Divide both sides of the equation by 2 to find 'x': 52 / 2 = 2x / 2 26 = x Now, we have the man's speed in still water (x = 26 kmph). Step 4: Substitute the value of 'x' back into equation (1) to find 'y': 34 = 26 + y y = 34 - 26 y = 8 So, the speed of the stream (y) is 8 kmph. Therefore, the correct answer is (D) 8 kmph.