BERT

🔍

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. [Question]: A young girl pours 23 blue beads and 16 yellow beads into a bowl. She divides the total into 3 equal parts, removes some beads from each part, and doubles the rest to have 6 beads in each part now. How many beads were removed from each part? [Answer]: There are 23 + 16 = 39 beads in the bowl. Dividing them into 3 equal parts give 39 / 3 = 13 beads each. Before doubling the number of beads, she had 6 / 2 = 3 beads left in each part. Therefore she had removed 13 - 3 = 10 beads from each part. So the answer is 10. [Question]: Amelia has 60 to spend on her dinner at a restaurant. The first course costs 15 and the second course 5 more. The cost of the dessert is 25% of the price of the second course. How much money will Amelia have left after buying all those meals? [Answer]: The second course cost Amelia 15 + 5 = 20. The dessert cost 25 / 100 * 20 = 5. That leaves Amelia with 60 - 15 - 20 - 5 = 20. So the answer is 20. [Question]: Melinda is taking a 1200-mile trip with her family to visit their cousins. How much time will they save if they drive 60 miles an hour instead of 50 miles an hour? [Answer]:

answer:First, let's find out how long the trip would take at each speed: At 50 miles an hour, the trip would take 1200 miles / 50 mph = 24 hours. At 60 miles an hour, the trip would take 1200 miles / 60 mph = 20 hours. Now, subtract the time it takes at the faster speed from the time it takes at the slower speed: 24 hours - 20 hours = 4 hours. So, Melinda's family would save 4 hours by driving at 60 miles an hour instead of 50 miles an hour.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Question: Claim: "My friend used Hubris when walking his dog." Is the claim above correct, and can it be verified by human common sense and without a web search? Options: - yes - no Let's think first. Step-by-step reasoning:

answer:Step 1: Understand the meaning of "Hubris". Hubris is a term that refers to excessive pride, arrogance, or self-confidence, especially in Greek tragedy, where it often leads to the protagonist's downfall. Step 2: Analyze the claim. The claim states that the person's friend used Hubris while walking his dog. This implies that the friend exhibited excessive pride or arrogance during this activity. Step 3: Evaluate the claim's correctness and verifiability. To determine if the claim is correct, we need to know whether the friend indeed displayed excessive pride, arrogance, or self-confidence while walking the dog. This information cannot be verified without further context or details about the specific situation. Step 4: Make a conclusion. Based on the information provided, the claim cannot be verified by human common sense and without a web search. Therefore, the answer is: - no

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. q: The average age of a class of 14 students is 10 yrs. if the teacher's age is also included, the average increases by one year. Find the age of the teacher Options: (A) 30 Years (B) 31 Years (C) 32 Years (D) 34 Years (E) 25 Years a: Stream of consciousness: Total age of students is 14X10 = 140 Years Total age inclusive of teacher = 15X (10+1) = 165 So, Teacher's age is 165-140 = 25 Yrs There is a shortcut for these type of problems Teacher's age is 10+(15X1) = 25 Years The answer is (E). question: A river 2m deep and 45 m wide is flowing at the rate of 3 kmph the amount of water that runs into the sea per minute is? Options: (A) 4500 M3 (B) 27000 M3 (C) 3000 M3 (D) 2700 M3 (E) 3700 M3 answer: Stream of consciousness: (3000 * 2 * 5)/60 = 4500 M3 The answer is (A). q: The length of a rectangle is increased by 15% and its breadth is decreased by 20%. What is the effect on its area? Options: (A) 1288 (B) 1299 (C) 1000 (D) 10000 (E) 9200 a: Stream of consciousness: 100 * 100 = 10000 115 * 80 = 9200 The answer is (E). question: A no.when divided by 224 gives a remainder 43, what remainder will beobtained by dividingthe same no.17? Options: (A) 2 (B) 7 (C) 9 (D) 11 (E) 12 answer: Stream of consciousness: 224 + 43 = 267/17 = 12 (Remainder) The answer is (E). q: Which is equal to 11? Options: (A) 1.1 (B) -11 (C) 11/11 (D) 11/1 (E) 1/11 a: Stream of consciousness: 11/1 is equal to 11. The answer is (D). q: Two persons A and B can complete a piece of work in 30 days and 45 days respectively. If they work together, what part of the work will be completed in 3 days? Options: (A) 1/5 (B) 1/1 (C) 1/6 (D) 1/3 (E) 1/7 a:

answer:Stream of consciousness: A completes work in 30 days, so in 1 day A completes 1/30 of the work. B completes work in 45 days, so in 1 day B completes 1/45 of the work. Together, they complete (1/30 + 1/45) of the work in 1 day. Finding the LCM of 30 and 45, we get 90. So, (1/30 + 1/45) = (3/90 + 2/90) = 5/90 of the work in 1 day. Now, we need to find the part of work completed in 3 days. So, (5/90) * 3 = 15/90 = 1/6 of the work. The answer is (C).

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. OK. You'll be given the following question. Please do chain-of-thought reasoning. Which of the following sentences is nonsensical? Options: - Sentence A: "I heard her singing in the next room" - Sentence B: "I heard her singing in the next city"

answer:To determine which of the following sentences is nonsensical, let's analyze each sentence and evaluate its meaning and plausibility. Sentence A: "I heard her singing in the next room" - In this sentence, the speaker is claiming to have heard someone singing in a room adjacent to the one they are in. This is a plausible scenario, as sound can travel through walls and doors, allowing someone to hear another person singing in a nearby room. Therefore, this sentence is not nonsensical. Sentence B: "I heard her singing in the next city" - In this sentence, the speaker is claiming to have heard someone singing in a different city. The distance between cities can vary greatly, but it's typically much farther than the distance between rooms in a building. It is highly unlikely that someone would be able to hear another person singing in a different city without the use of electronic devices or other forms of amplification. As a result, this sentence is less plausible than Sentence A. Based on the analysis above, Sentence B: "I heard her singing in the next city" is more nonsensical than Sentence A: "I heard her singing in the next room," due to the implausibility of hearing someone singing from such a significant distance without any assistance.